It’s Okay? Really?

I’m happy to see a piece of mine in the current issue of Buddhadharma magazine, but, as is always the case with anything published anywhere, I also wonder who it was who wrote it and whether I’ll be confused for him.  Certainly the artist’s rendition of me accompanying the piece would mitigate against my being confused for the author – clearly a much stockier and even stranger looking individual than myself – but there remains nonetheless the risk.

The piece, in the “Journeys” back page section of the magazine and titled It’s Okay. Really., was written about a year or so ago.  (You can find the piece here.)  At the time, I’d been advised that my family story was something worth sharing, and I was also finding myself very inspired by the ideas that Zen can be completely realized in ordinary life – no recourse to “formal practice” necessary – and that things, in their inconceivably non-thingness, are indeed “ok.”

I still think so.  I still insist that it’s a total copout to say even once that the circumstances of your life don’t allow you to practice (ok – maybe once is alright, but no more!), and I still hold that fundamentally everything is even more okay than “okay”.  But as I spoke and wrote along these lines, I eventually started to feel uncomfortable.  I wasn’t uncomfortable because people’s objection that “fundamentally things are NOT okay if you look at the suffering of the world!” convinced me – a lifelong reflection on that view is precisely what brought me to the points I was making.  It was because I felt that for all of my attempts to round out what I was saying, to show the other side (as Zen people are legally bound by the Platform Sutra to do of any issue), I was close to if not already falling into a one-sided view.

That’s the other thing about saying anything, I suppose, that whatever you say is just one thing, and just one thing is never complete.

After one talk I gave drawing from the Buddhadharma piece I was drafting on “it’s okay,” my friend Liz helped me to clarify that the spirit of our practice is really less about “okay” or “not okay” so much as about not sticking.  It isn’t that we say and hear “it’s okay” and then stick to that as the real truth, or that we hear or say “no need to do sesshin” and make that the next thing to stick to.  The point is that we hold it all without sticking to any of it.

I’d still say that most of us, most of the time, stick to a “not okay” view of the world.  The Buddhist teachings even affirm that view:  the world really is a place marked by suffering and dissatisfaction.  But when we stick to that view, really hold to a “broken world,” we’re missing another kind of opportunity, another kind of seeing that we equally need.

“It’s okay,” then, is offered not as the authentic final truth so much as medicine, a truth that unsticks us from the unhelpful despair of our deep-seated feeling that in fact it’s not okay.  Stick to the “okay” medicine and it becomes a kind of kool aid, becomes complacency.  But if we revert to our sense of despair and powerlessness about the world, we cut off the fullness and vastness and inconceivability our shared being – we obscure the impossible beauty of being alive at all.

That’s how I see it now, anyway, and I think it’s what my stocky and strange-looking “last year’s man” was trying express in his own way.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to It’s Okay? Really?

  1. Mike Haitch says:

    I’ve woken up this morning from what I think is a third night of nightmares. I feel the results in aching muscles and a firey belly. Yet I wake up feeling pleased and puzzled.

    The puzzle is always the same “why am I ok with this?” and “Am I deluding myself?”

    It seems the stuff of nightmares can often best be faced through nightmares. It seems that emotions trapped in the body need to be felt to be released. Nightmares these days are not like the early days, they feel like befriending rather than running away from demons.

    “the end of suffering” was one pill I really wanted to swallow. “no suffering and no end of suffering” is a much more difficult pill to swallow and yet it seems that one pill needs the other.

    On some days I see suffering around me. On some days I do not. In some days I feel that it’s ok to do nothing about what I see. On some days I feel it’s ok to act on what I see. Or do I find myself acting or not-acting, I lose track.

    On some days the world feels ok and everyone seems to agree with that. On some days the world feels not-so-ok and everyone seems to agree with that. I’ve no idea what the truth is.

    Maybe I’m ok and the world is ok. Maybe we both need work.

    Today I will do things that I find restful because that is what I need. I’d like to not need rest but that is not where I am today.

    It’s nice to see a glimpse of the man behind the monk.

    Mike.

  2. James says:

    Jiryu, I just read your article. What a powerful and compelling piece. Thank you. James

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s